I greatly enjoyed the OCR feature, which allowed me to scan and save lots of old useful documents and to be able to search them when needed. Honestly though, it’s still top of my list for all but a few features. Note taking apps like Bear and Ulysses look nice, but I’m hesitant to buy an app that isn’t future proofed a bit knowing how fickle I am with technology.Įvernote used to be my main solution for this, but the price increase, controversial privacy policy updates, and inability to support some of the features that I want natively have ruled it out as my day to day note app.
BOOSTNOTE VIEW MARKDOWN ONLY ANDROID
While I use a Mac as my main computer, I use Android for phone, and I can’t guarantee that I’ll always stick with this platform.
BOOSTNOTE VIEW MARKDOWN ONLY FOR MAC
One of the problems that I’ve found with most apps on the market is that they are made only for Mac and Apple products. I try to type everything that I post on any of my websites in a separate program first, and to copy and manage them when I’m ready to post. I like to keep my notes available on multiple devices, and ensure that they are backed up in multiple places so that I don’t lose them. Optional support through MathJax, need to configure in ’ve used a lot of note taking apps over the years. mdBook, "Like Gitbook but implemented in Rust" Same as Reveal.js - need to put math inside backticks. To use them together, without bugs, put formula inside backticks:Ĭan customize MathJax config, so can be configured to use other delimiters and even AsciiMath. Reveal.js by has MathJax support and markdown support. Naked latex environment \begin.Īpparently this plugin only deals with rendering, you also need a Python-markdown extension to protect _ etc in math from getting parsed as markdown - and the recognized syntaxes might not exactly match. I'd say this backward compatibility is not that important for converters (if you have a math-rich document, you'll not be happy with a converter that merely doesn't choke on it, you want the math to actually render) but a considerable win for editors. This avoids runaway misformatting due to _ or *. Their upside is they are interpreted as literal text by engines that don't understand the syntax. Pro: doesn't interfere with escaping parens and brackets (introduced by MultiMarkdown for this reason). \\(a link)ĭouble backslash: \\(inline\\) and \\ Single backslash: \(inline\) and \Ĭon: interferes with ability to escape parens and brackets e.g. There are frequently restrictions on when this is recognized. Pro: same as LaTeX ( $$ is deprecated TeX syntax but never mind), easiest to write.Ĭon: prone to false positives like $20 - confusing to users who don't write math. It's a superset of latex math, so could be used harmlessly(?) with these proposals. CoffeeTeX is an intriguing new option, based on a lot of unicode.Arguably syntaxes like AsciiMath (MMD used to do this), are a better match for Markdown's philosophy, but most people who care about non-trivial math support already know LaTeX syntax (which is why MMD 3 switched to LaTeX). I'm taking for granted that the content of the math fragments is LaTeX syntax. If you're adding math support to your markdown tool, I have one plea: please consider supporting standard LaTeX delimiters before inventing your own. It'd be nice if everybody could agree on the same syntax(es) to denote math fragments in Markdown alas, as every extension to Markdown, it's a mess :-( TODO: This is becoming useful as a cheatsheet => rearrange this page to be user-oriented before being developer-oriented. button on top, you need to Sign in/up to Github.]ī3log:, (implemented, need to understand syntax) $\alpha$ ✏️ this is a wiki, everyone is welcome to contribute ✏️
0 kommentar(er)
